CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2690 v2 vs E5-2687W v3 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5 2690 v2 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5 2690 v2  based on its cost to run.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 2690 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 2690 v2

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 88 °C vs 74.7 °C Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Around 5% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 105.63W vs 130W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year vs 140.16 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year vs 38.54 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Jul, 2013 Release date a year later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 2690 v2 vs E5-2687W v3

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5 2690 v2
2,100,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-2687W v3
3,340,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5 2690 v2  vs
E5-2687W v3 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Deca core Deca core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 160W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 38.54 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 140.16 $/year
Performance per watt 10.91 pt/W 9.91 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 130W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 64,000 MB/s 76,800 MB/s
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 9,600 MT/s
Clock speed 4,000 MHz 4,800 MHz

details

Xeon E5 2690 v2  vs
E5-2687W v3 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 20 20
L3 cache 25 MB 25 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 88°C Unknown - 74.7°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.24 GHz 3.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 3.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.24 GHz 3.21 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 59,733.32 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 786,432 MB
Intel Xeon E5 2690 v2
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus