Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2680 |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2689
- 2.6 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2689
 | Lower typical power consumption 93.44W | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year |
| | Lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2680
- 2.7 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2680
| | Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower typical power consumption | 93.44W | vs | 105.63W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2680
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2680 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2680 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 16 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 115W | 130W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.97 pt/W | 7.63 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2689  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2680 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,155 | ||
| 2650 v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs E5-2689 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,086 | ||
| E5-2690 vs E5-2689 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,594 | ||
| E5-2670 vs E5-2689 | ||
 | VS | |
| Ryzen™ 5 1600 vs E5-2689 | ||
 | VS | |
| Ryzen™ 7 1700 vs E5-2689 | ||
 | VS | |
| $583 | ||
| 1650 v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
