0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2680 |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2689
- 2.6 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2689
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 93.44W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2680
- 2.7 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2680
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 93.44W | vs | 105.63W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2680
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
36,294
Xeon E5-2680
9,438
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
2,912
Xeon E5-2680
2,569
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
2,360,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-2680
2,060,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2689
19,521
Xeon E5-2680
19,922
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2689
2,091
Xeon E5-2680
1,774
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2680 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2680 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 115W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.97 pt/W | 7.63 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-2689 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2680 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | ||
2650 v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | ||
E5-2690 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | ||
E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$901 | ||
E5-2640 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,594 | $1,761 | |
E5-2670 vs E5-2680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,703 | $1,761 | |
2680 v2 vs E5-2680 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||