Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2670 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E5-2689 vs the E5-2670. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E5-2670 vs the E5-2689. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2670
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 16 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 115W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.97 pt/W | 7.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 93.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2689  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2670 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $262 | ||
| E5-2689 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,086 | ||
| E5-2689 vs E5-2690 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,155 | ||
| E5-2689 vs 2650 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| E5-2689 vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $410 | ||
| E5-2689 vs E5-2620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,594 | $350 | |
| E5-2670 vs 6700K | ||
| | VS | |
| $1,594 | $1,155 | |
| E5-2670 vs 2650 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
