0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2630L v3 |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2689
- 2.6 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2689
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- 1.8 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2630L v3
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 93.44W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date over 2 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2630L v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
36,294
Xeon E5-2630L v3
22,709
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
2,912
Xeon E5-2630L v3
2,836
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
2,360,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-2630L v3
1,730 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2689
19,521
Xeon E5-2630L v3
7,767
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2689
2,091
Xeon E5-2630L v3
1,650
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2630L v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-2630L v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 115W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.97 pt/W | 5.04 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 44.69W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-2689 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | ||
E5-2689 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | ||
E5-2689 vs 2650 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | ||
E5-2689 vs E5-2690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$901 | ||
E5-2689 vs E5-2640 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
E5-2689 vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | ||
E5-2689 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$612 | $262 | |
E5-2630L v3 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||