0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-1650 v3 |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2689
- 2.6 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2689
![]() | Much more l3 cache 20 MB | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 10.97 pt/W |
![]() | More threads 16 | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 93.44W |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the E5-1650 v3
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Newer Jul, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 15 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per watt | 10.97 pt/W | vs | 1.86 pt/W | Around 6x better performance per watt | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 93.44W | vs | 113.75W | Around 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | vs | 122.64 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | vs | 33.73 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date over 2 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-1650 v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
36,294
Xeon E5-1650 v3
9,276.5
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
2,912
Xeon E5-1650 v3
3,153
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2689
2,360,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-1650 v3
3,895 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2689
19,521
Xeon E5-1650 v3
13,560
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2689
2,091
Xeon E5-1650 v3
2,129
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-1650 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Hexa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Xeon E5-2689 | vs | E5-1650 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 16 | 12 | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 15 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 115W | 140W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 33.73 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 122.64 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.97 pt/W | 1.86 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 113.75W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 0 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 0 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-2689 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | ||
E5-2690 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | ||
2650 v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Ryzen™ 5 1600 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | ||
1650 v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$901 | ||
E5-2640 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | ||
3770 vs E5-2689 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||