Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5-2689

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2689

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2689

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2689

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 10.97 pt/W vs 3.12 pt/W More than 3.5x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 93.44W vs 109.69W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
More threads 16 vs 10 6 more threads
Better PassMark score 19,521 vs 15,516 More than 25% better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,091 vs 1,865 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year vs 32.52 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year vs 118.26 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel E5-4627V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-4627V4

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 10 vs 8 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 4 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-4627V4

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5-2689
19,521
E5-4627V4
15,516

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E5-2689
2,091
E5-4627V4
1,865

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2689  vs
E5-4627V4 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Octa core Deca core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon E5-2689  vs
E5-4627V4 
Threads 16 10
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 4

power consumption

TDP 115W 135W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 32.52 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 118.26 $/year
Performance per watt 10.97 pt/W 3.12 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 109.69W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 2
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 8,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E5-2689
Report a correction
Intel E5-4627V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus