Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2689

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2689

Report a correction
More l3 cache 20 MB vs 16 MB 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 12 4 more threads
Front view of AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Reasons to consider the
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More l3 cache per core 2.67 MB/core vs 2.5 MB/core More than 5% more l3 cache per core

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2689  vs Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 

clock speed

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2689  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Octa core Hexa core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

details

Xeon E5-2689  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 
Threads 16 12
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.67 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 93.44W N/A
Intel Xeon E5-2689
Report a correction
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus