Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 35 MB vs 3 MB Around 11.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 14 vs 2 12 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 28 vs 4 24 more threads
Much better PassMark score 17,486 vs 5,478 Around 3.2x better PassMark score
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 65,536 MB Supports 12x more RAM
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 65% more l3 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 82.5 °C vs 65 °C More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Core i3 6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 1.84 pt/$ vs 0.18 pt/$ More than 10x better performance per dollar
Much lower typical power consumption 41.44W vs 97.5W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz vs 2.76 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,106 vs 1,654 More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 4.51 pt/W vs 2.81 pt/W More than 60% better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year vs 28.91 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year vs 105.12 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.39 GHz vs 2.85 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jul, 2014 Release date a year later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2683 v3 vs Core i3 6100

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2683 v3  vs
Core i3 6100 
Clock speed 2 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Processing Cores Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 120W 51W
Annual home energy cost 28.91 $/year 12.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 105.12 $/year 44.68 $/year
Performance per watt 2.81 pt/W 4.51 pt/W
Typical power consumption 97.5W 41.44W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 1
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 8,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E5-2683 v3  vs
Core i3 6100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 28 4
L3 cache 35 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 82.5°C Unknown - 65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.76 GHz 4.25 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.85 GHz 4.39 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.76 GHz 4.25 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1333
DDR
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 6100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus