CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2680 vs E5-4669V4 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2680 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2680  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2680

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2680

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 19,922 vs 13,626 More than 45% better PassMark score
Much better performance per watt 7.63 pt/W vs 2.58 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,774 vs 1,250 More than 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.14 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly lower typical power consumption 105.63W vs 109.69W Around 5% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year vs 32.52 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year vs 118.26 $/year Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel E5-4669V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-4669V4

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 22 vs 8 14 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 44 vs 16 28 more threads
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 393,216 MB Supports 4x more RAM
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 4 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2680 vs E5-4669V4

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5-2680
19,922
E5-4669V4
13,626

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E5-2680
1,774
E5-4669V4
1,250

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2680  vs
E5-4669V4 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Octa core Processing Cores

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 135W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 32.52 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 118.26 $/year
Performance per watt 7.63 pt/W 2.58 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 109.69W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 2
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 9,600 MT/s

details

Xeon E5-2680  vs
E5-4669V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 16 44
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 4

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.14 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.14 GHz 2.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 393,216 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2680
Report a correction
Intel E5-4669V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus