Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2670

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2670

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 20 MB vs 16 MB 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2.5x more l3 cache per core
Front view of AMD Opteron 6280

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6280

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 16 MB vs 2 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2670  vs Opteron 6280 

clock speed

Xeon E5-2670
2.6 GHz
Opteron 6280
2.5 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2670  vs
Opteron 6280 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Octa core 16 core
Socket type
LGA 2011
G34

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Xeon E5-2670  vs
Opteron 6280 
Threads 16 16
L2 cache 2 MB 16 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 4

power consumption

TDP 115W 115W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 27.7 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 100.74 $/year
Typical power consumption 93.44W 93.44W

bus

Architecture QPI HyperTransport 3.0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 6,400 MT/s
Clock speed 4,000 MHz 3,200 MHz
Intel Xeon E5-2670
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6280
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus