Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2680V4 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- 3.2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | | Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.44 GHz | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,045 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2680V4
- 2.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the E5-2680V4
| | Much more l3 cache 35 MB | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | More cores 14 | | More threads 28 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.44 GHz | vs | 2.82 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,045 | vs | 1,774 | More than 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 35 MB | vs | 20 MB | 75% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More cores | 14 | vs | 8 | 6 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 28 | vs | 16 | 12 more threads | |||
| Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 786,432 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| Better PassMark score | 19,922 | vs | 16,101 | Around 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 97.5W | vs | 109.69W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 86 °C | vs | 77.8 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 28.91 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 105.12 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2680V4
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | E5-2680V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 135W | 120W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 28.91 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 105.12 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.29 pt/W | 2.89 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 97.5W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | E5-2680V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 16 | 28 | |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 35 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 77.8°C | Unknown - 86°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.44 GHz | 2.82 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.44 GHz | 2.82 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 1,572,864 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3  Report a correction |  Intel E5-2680V4 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,745 | $1,900 | |
| E5-2680V4 vs E5-2680 v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,745 | $4,115 | |
| E5-2680V4 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,745 | $1,500 | |
| E5-2680V4 vs E5-2660 v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,745 | $2,806 | |
| E5-2680V4 vs E5-2697 v3 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $2,057 | $2,057 | |
| E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2667V4 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,057 | $2,150 | |
| E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2687W v3 | ||
| | VS | |
| $2,057 | $1,900 | |
| E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2680 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
