Winner
Intel Xeon E5 2667 v2
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5 2667 v2 based on its value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5 2667 v2 vs E5-2667 |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 25 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz |
![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 9.58 pt/W |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 15 MB | More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 9.58 pt/W | vs | 3.58 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 393,216 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
More l2 cache | 2.5 MB | vs | 2 MB | 25% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 3.22 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 85 °C | vs | 74 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature |
summary | Xeon E5 2667 v2 | vs | E5-2667 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.58 pt/W | 3.58 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E5 2667 v2 | vs | E5-2667 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.31 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 25 MB | 15 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 33 | 35 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74°C | Unknown - 85°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 3.22 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 3.22 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 393,216 MB |
Intel Xeon E5 2667 v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2667 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,594 | $1,552 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 vs E5-2667 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $1,552 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs Xeon E5-2667 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,057 | ||
Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5 2667 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,581 | $2,057 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs 2667 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,703 | $2,057 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2680 v2 vs 2667 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,032 | $2,057 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2690 v2 vs 2667 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | $2,057 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs E5 2667 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||