Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2 vs E5-2658 |
Expected September, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2
- 2.4 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2
 | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | Much more l3 cache 25 MB |
| | More l2 cache 2.5 MB | | More threads 20 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 20 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l2 cache | 2.5 MB | vs | 2 MB | 25% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 20 | vs | 16 | 4 more threads | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Xeon E5-2658 vs the Xeon E5 2658L v2. | |||||||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5 2658L v2 vs E5-2658
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 2658L v2 | vs | E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Deca core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Data rate | 32,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5 2658L v2 | vs | E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 20 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 20 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 24 | 24 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
 Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2658 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $294 | $1,479 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 vs E5-2658 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $1,479 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790 vs Xeon E5-2658 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,303 | $1,479 | |
| Intel Xeon X5660 vs E5-2658 | ||
 | VS | |
| $168 | $1,479 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs Xeon E5-2658 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,594 | $1,479 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 vs E5-2658 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,479 | ||
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2658 | ||
 | VS | |
| $264 | $1,479 | |
| Intel Core i7 3770K vs Xeon E5-2658 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
