0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2 vs 2650L v2 |
Expected September, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2
- 2.4 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2650L v2
- 1.7 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the 2650L v2
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 56.88W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 16.86 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 56.88W | vs | 77.19W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon E5 2658L v2 vs 2650L v2
clock speed
Xeon E5 2658L v2
2.4 GHz
Xeon E5 2650L v2
1.7 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E5 2658L v2
2.5 MB
Xeon E5 2650L v2
2.5 MB
L3 cache
Xeon E5 2658L v2
25 MB
Xeon E5 2650L v2
25 MB
TDP
Xeon E5 2658L v2
95W
Xeon E5 2650L v2
70W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 2658L v2 | vs | 2650L v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
Cores | Deca core | Deca core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 70W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 16.86 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 61.32 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 56.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Data rate | 32,000 MB/s | 57,600 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,600 MHz |
details | Xeon E5 2658L v2 | vs | 2650L v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 20 | 20 | |
L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 25 MB | 25 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 24 | 17 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s |
Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5 2650L v2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | $1,155 | |
2650L v2 vs 2650 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | $662 | |
2650L v2 vs E5-2630L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | $612 | |
2650L v2 vs E5-2630L v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | $1,107 | |
2650L v2 vs E5-2650L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | $612 | |
2650L v2 vs 2630L v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | $1,594 | |
2650L v2 vs E5-2670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | ||
2650L v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||