Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2 vs 2650L v2 |
Expected September, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2
- 2.4 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2
 | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2650L v2
- 1.7 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the 2650L v2
| | Lower typical power consumption 56.88W | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year |
| | Lower annual home energy cost 16.86 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Lower typical power consumption | 56.88W | vs | 77.19W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5 2658L v2 vs 2650L v2
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 2658L v2 | vs | 2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Deca core | Deca core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 70W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 16.86 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 61.32 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 56.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Data rate | 32,000 MB/s | 57,600 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,600 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5 2658L v2 | vs | 2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 20 | 20 | |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 25 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 24 | 17 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
 Intel Xeon E5 2658L v2  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5 2650L v2 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,250 | $1,155 | |
| 2650L v2 vs 2650 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,250 | $1,126 | |
| 2650L v2 vs E5-2650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,250 | $1,107 | |
| 2650L v2 vs E5-2650L | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,250 | ||
| 2650L v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,250 | $272 | |
| 2650L v2 vs 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,250 | $612 | |
| 2650L v2 vs 2630L v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,250 | $1,200 | |
| 2650L v2 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
