Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3

Report a correction
Significantly more l3 cache 30 MB vs 16 MB Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 12 vs 6 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 24 vs 12 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Reasons to consider the
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache per core 2.67 MB/core vs 2.5 MB/core More than 5% more l3 cache per core

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2658 v3  vs Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 

clock speed

turbo clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2658 v3  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Duodeca core Hexa core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
AVX 2.0
FMA3

details

Xeon E5-2658 v3  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 
Threads 24 12
L3 cache 30 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.67 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 85.31W N/A
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
Report a correction
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus