CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2658 v2 vs 6800K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel 6800K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel 6800K  based on its single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel 6800K

Intel 6800K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 113.75W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
More cores 10 vs 6 4 more cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 20 vs 12 8 more threads
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 131,072 MB Supports 6x more RAM
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better performance per watt 3.97 pt/W vs 2.86 pt/W Around 40% better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 33.73 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 122.64 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel 6800K

Reasons to consider the
Intel 6800K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,062 vs 1,587 Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2658 v2 vs 6800K

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

6800K
13,636

PassMark (Single Core)

6800K
2,062

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2658 v2  vs
6800K 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Deca core Hexa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 131,072 MB

details

Xeon E5-2658 v2  vs
6800K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 20 12
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 95W 140W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 122.64 $/year
Performance per watt 3.97 pt/W 2.86 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 113.75W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 1
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2
Report a correction
Intel 6800K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus