Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5-2650L

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2650L
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Intel Core i7 4770K

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2650L

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2650L

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 8 MB 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Lower typical power consumption 56.88W vs 68.25W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Supports more RAM 393,216 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 12x more RAM
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Lower annual home energy cost 16.86 $/year vs 20.24 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year vs 73.58 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 95% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 70% higher turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.83 pt/$ vs 0.45 pt/$ More than 8.5x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,165 vs 1,117 Around 95% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better performance per watt 11.31 pt/W vs 7.09 pt/W Around 60% better performance per watt
Better PassMark score 10,016 vs 8,676 More than 15% better PassMark score
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2650L vs Core i7 4770K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2650L
5,131
Core i7 4770K
14,184

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2650L
1,522
Core i7 4770K
3,689

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2650L
1,030,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770K
4,810,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2650L
16,330
Core i7 4770K
14,351

GeekBench

Xeon E5-2650L
16,330
Core i7 4770K
18,498

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5-2650L
8,676
Core i7 4770K
10,016

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E5-2650L
1,117
Core i7 4770K
2,165

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Xeon E5-2650L  vs
Core i7 4770K 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.3 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 51,200 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 393,216 MB 32,768 MB

details

 Xeon E5-2650L  vs
Core i7 4770K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 72.72°C

integrated graphics
GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,250 MHz

power consumption
TDP 70W 84W
Annual home energy cost 16.86 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 7.09 pt/W 11.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 56.88W 68.25W

bus
Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 2 0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E5-2650L
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss