Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 based on its cost to run and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs E5-2640 v3 |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 25 MB | ![]() | More threads 20 |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.22 pt/$ | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 73.13W |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 20 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 20 | vs | 16 | 4 more threads | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.22 pt/$ | vs | 0.69 pt/$ | Around 3.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 73.13W | vs | 85.31W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.44 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 78.84 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 21.68 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | E5-2640 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Deca core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 90W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 21.68 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 78.84 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.93 pt/W | 24.65 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 73.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | E5-2640 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 20 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 25 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 78.9°C | Unknown - 74.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.44 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.44 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | $1,000 | |
E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2640 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$996 | $1,000 | |
E5-2637 v3 vs E5-2640 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$939 | $1,000 | |
E5-2640V4 vs E5-2640 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $1,000 | |
3220 vs E5-2640 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | $1,200 | |
2650 v2 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | $1,200 | |
E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $1,200 | |
6700K vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||