CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2650 v3 vs 3570K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 25 MB vs 6 MB Around 4.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 20 vs 4 16 more threads
More cores 10 vs 4 6 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better PassMark score 14,951 vs 7,152 More than 2x better PassMark score
Significantly lower typical power consumption 85.31W vs 107.5W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 24x more RAM
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 65% more l3 cache per core
Significantly better performance per watt 7.93 pt/W vs 4.69 pt/W Around 70% better performance per watt
Higher Maximum operating temperature 78.9 °C vs 67.4 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year vs 38.81 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year vs 106 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3570K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.09 pt/$ vs 0.69 pt/$ Around 4.5x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.59 GHz vs 2.44 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,012 vs 1,691 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.71 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core i5 3570K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2650 v3
1,565,000 MB/s
Core i5 3570K
2,650,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2650 v3  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Deca core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 105W 77W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 38.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 106 $/year
Performance per watt 7.93 pt/W 4.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 85.31W 107.5W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 2 1
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E5-2650 v3  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 20 4
L3 cache 25 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 78.9°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.44 GHz 4.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 4.71 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz 4.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 10.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
DDR
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3570K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus