0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 2637 v2 vs 1620 v2 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2637 v2
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 2637 v2
![]() | Much more l3 cache 15 MB | ![]() | Supports more RAM 786,432 MB |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 3.75 MB/core |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the 1620 v2
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.7 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 13.06 pt/W |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 5.78 pt/$ | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.21 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 10 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 262,144 MB | Supports 3x more RAM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 3.75 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | vs | 4.36 pt/W | Around 3x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 5.78 pt/$ | vs | 0.57 pt/$ | Around 10.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.21 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.8 GHz | Around 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 2637 v2 vs 1620 v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2637 v2
8,024
Xeon E5 1620 v2
12,932
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2637 v2
1,453
Xeon E5 1620 v2
3,262
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2637 v2
804,100 MB/s
Xeon E5 1620 v2
2,650,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 2637 v2 | vs | 1620 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.36 pt/W | 13.06 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Number of links | 2 | 0 |
details | Xeon E5 2637 v2 | vs | 1620 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 10 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3.75 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 35 | 37 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | 4.03 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.6 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 59,733.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 262,144 MB |
Intel Xeon E5 2637 v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $294 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs Xeon E5 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$294 | $294 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 vs E5 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $294 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs Xeon E5 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | $294 | |
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 vs 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$297 | $294 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs E5 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $294 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon E5 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,552 | $996 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2643 v2 vs 2637 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||