0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2630L vs AMD Opteron 4184 |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2630L
- 2 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2630L
![]() | Much more l3 cache 15 MB | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 7,868 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,596 | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 10.72 pt/W |
VS
Released June, 2010
AMD Opteron 4184
- 2.8 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 4184
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 3 MB |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2630LCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 6 MB | 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 7,868 | vs | 4,418 | Around 80% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,596 | vs | 969 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 10.72 pt/W | vs | 1.4 pt/W | Around 7.8x better performance per watt | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 6 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2.5x more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 48.75W | vs | 77.19W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Mar, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2010 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 2 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 50% more l2 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2630L vs Opteron 4184
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630L
7,171
Opteron 4184
9,801
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630L
1,924
Opteron 4184
1,181
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630L
1,400,000 MB/s
Opteron 4184
88.4 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2630L
7,868
Opteron 4184
4,418
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2630L
1,596
Opteron 4184
969
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2630L | vs | Opteron 4184 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
C32 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 60W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.72 pt/W | 1.4 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 48.75W | 77.19W |
details | Xeon E5-2630L | vs | Opteron 4184 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 6 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 25 | 14 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 1.3 - UnknownV | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.8°C | 0 - 55°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 2,200 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-2630L ![]() | AMD Opteron 4184 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | $605 | |
E5-2630L vs E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | $410 | |
E5-2630L vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | $294 | |
E5-2630L vs E5-1620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | $612 | |
E5-2630L vs 2630L v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | $350 | |
E5-2630L vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | $610 | |
E5-2630L vs 2630 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | $264 | |
E5-2630L vs E5-2407 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||