CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2630L vs 2376 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2630L  based on its performance and cost to run.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2630L

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2630L

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 15 MB vs 6 MB 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 7,868 vs 2,283 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better performance per watt 10.72 pt/W vs 1.24 pt/W More than 8.5x better performance per watt
More threads 12 vs 4 Three times as many threads
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 65% more l3 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 48.75W vs 60.94W 20% lower typical power consumption
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Nov, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 52.56 $/year vs 65.7 $/year 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 14.45 $/year vs 18.07 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2376

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2376

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 50% more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2630L vs Opteron 2376

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2630L  vs
Opteron 2376 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 60W 75W
Annual home energy cost 14.45 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 52.56 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 10.72 pt/W 1.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 48.75W 60.94W

details

Xeon E5-2630L  vs
Opteron 2376 
Threads 12 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 15 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 25 11
Voltage range 0.6 - 1.35V 1.3 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.8°C 0 - 55°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 3,600 MHz 2,000 MHz
Intel Xeon E5-2630L
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2376
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus