0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 vs E5-2630 v3 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- 1.8 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
![]() | Much better performance per watt 5.04 pt/W | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 44.69W |
![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the E5-2630 v3
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.75 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2630L v3 vs E5-2630 v3 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 5.04 pt/W | vs | 3.52 pt/W | Around 45% better performance per watt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 69.06W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 74.46 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 20.48 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.75 GHz | vs | 2.07 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2630L v3 vs E5-2630 v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630L v3
22,709
Xeon E5-2630 v3
21,692
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630L v3
2,836
Xeon E5-2630 v3
1,729
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630L v3
1,730 MB/s
Xeon E5-2630 v3
2,230 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2630L v3
7,767
Xeon E5-2630 v3
12,838
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2630L v3
1,650
Xeon E5-2630 v3
1,756
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 85W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.04 pt/W | 3.52 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60.4°C | Unknown - 72.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.07 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.07 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | ||
E6600 vs G3240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $303 | |
2400 vs 4785T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$112 | $227 | |
3225 vs 4300M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $200 | |
4770 vs 4590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $287 | |
E5700 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | ||
6010 vs 8320 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,107 | $885 | |
E5-2450L vs E5-2643 | ||