0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 2630L v2 vs E5-2630L |
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2630L v2
- 2.4 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 2630L v2
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.2 pt/$ |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Supports more RAM 786,432 MB |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2630L
- 2 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2630L
![]() | More l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per dollar | 1.2 pt/$ | vs | 0.97 pt/$ | Around 25% better performance per dollar | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 393,216 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
More l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1.5 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 2630L v2 vs E5-2630L
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2630L v2
8,834
Xeon E5-2630L
7,171
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2630L v2
2,245
Xeon E5-2630L
1,924
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2630L v2
1,050,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-2630L
1,400,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 2630L v2 | vs | E5-2630L |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 60W | 60W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | 14.45 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | 52.56 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 12.21 pt/W | 10.72 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 48.75W | 48.75W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 57,600 MB/s | 57,600 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 3,600 MHz |
details | Xeon E5 2630L v2 | vs | E5-2630L |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 15 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 24 | 25 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 69.8°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 42,666.64 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 393,216 MB |
Intel Xeon E5 2630L v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2630L ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$662 | ||
4184 vs E5-2630L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$605 | $662 | |
E5-2630 vs E5-2630L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | $662 | |
E5-2620 vs E5-2630L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$440 | $612 | |
2620 v2 vs 2630L v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$610 | $612 | |
2630 v2 vs 2630L v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,250 | $612 | |
2650L v2 vs 2630L v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$612 | $612 | |
E5-2630LV4 vs 2630L v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||