Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2630

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.33 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.47 GHz More than 90% higher turbo clock speed
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 125.94W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
More threads 12 vs 8 4 more threads
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 135.78 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 37.34 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Itanium 9320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9320

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 2 6 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 2.5 MB/core 60% more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 16 MB vs 15 MB More than 5% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 50% more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2630  vs Itanium 9320 

clock speed

Xeon E5-2630
2.3 GHz
Itanium 9320
1.33 GHz

turbo clock speed

Xeon E5-2630
2.8 GHz
Itanium 9320
1.47 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2630  vs
Itanium 9320 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.33 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.47 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
LGA 1248

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 155W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 37.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 135.78 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 125.94W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 1
Data rate 57,600 MB/s 19,200 MB/s
Transfer rate 7,200 MT/s 4,800 MT/s
Clock speed 3,600 MHz 2,400 MHz

details

Xeon E5-2630  vs
Itanium 9320 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 8
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 15 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 4 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 2 8

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon E5-2630
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9320
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus