Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2630
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2630 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5-2630 vs AMD Opteron 2431 |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 15 MB | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 8,634 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,634 | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 8.05 pt/W |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 3 MB | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 60.94W | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 6 MB | 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 8,634 | vs | 4,516 | More than 90% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,634 | vs | 877 | More than 85% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 8.05 pt/W | vs | 1.89 pt/W | More than 4.2x better performance per watt | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 6 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2.5x more l3 cache per core | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.55 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.74 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Mar, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2009 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 2 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 77.19W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Opteron 2431 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 75W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 18.07 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 65.7 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.05 pt/W | 1.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 60.94W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 2,200 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Opteron 2431 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 6 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 28 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 1 - UnknownV | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 77.4°C | 0 - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.74 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.55 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 ![]() | AMD Opteron 2431 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | $605 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 vs E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$610 | $605 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2630 v2 vs E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$901 | $605 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $605 | |
Intel Xeon X5650 vs E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,126 | $605 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2650 vs E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,534 | $605 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2670 v2 vs E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $605 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon E5-2630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||