0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2698V4 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 69.06W | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Significantly better performance per dollar 0.44 pt/$ | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.75 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2698V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the E5-2698V4
![]() | Much more l3 cache 50 MB | ![]() | More cores 20 |
![]() | More threads 40 | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 69.06W | vs | 109.69W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better performance per dollar | 0.44 pt/$ | vs | 0.14 pt/$ | More than 3x better performance per dollar | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.75 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,756 | vs | 1,584 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 50 MB | vs | 20 MB | 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 20 | vs | 8 | 12 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more threads | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better PassMark score | 21,789 | vs | 12,838 | Around 70% better PassMark score | |||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 786,432 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 72.1 °C | Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2698V4
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630 v3
21,692
E5-2698V4
34,607.5
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630 v3
1,729
E5-2698V4
2,672
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2630 v3
2,230 MB/s
E5-2698V4
3,415 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2630 v3
12,838
E5-2698V4
21,789
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2630 v3
1,756
E5-2698V4
1,584
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | E5-2698V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Processing Cores | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 85W | 135W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | 32.52 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | 118.26 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.52 pt/W | 3.4 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 69.06W | 109.69W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | E5-2698V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 40 | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 50 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.1°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.75 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.37 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.75 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 ![]() | Intel E5-2698V4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$556 | $681 | |
E3-1285 v4 vs E5-2630 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | $681 | |
E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2630 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$667 | $681 | |
E5-2630V4 vs E5-2630 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$417 | $681 | |
E5-2620V4 vs E5-2630 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $681 | |
6700K vs E5-2630 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $681 | |
5960X vs E5-2630 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,226 | $3,226 | |
E5-2698 v3 vs E5-2698V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||