Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2620
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2620 based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5-2620 vs E5-2450L |
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 6.57 pt/W |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.52 pt/$ | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 20 MB | ![]() | More threads 16 |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 56.88W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Xeon E5-2620CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per watt | 6.57 pt/W | vs | 3.29 pt/W | Around 2x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.52 pt/$ | vs | 0.21 pt/$ | More than 7.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 15 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 56.88W | vs | 77.19W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon E5-2620 | vs | E5-2450L |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 70W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 16.86 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 61.32 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.57 pt/W | 3.29 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 56.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
Data rate | 57,600 MB/s | 32,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2620 | vs | E5-2450L |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Triple Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s | 38,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 393,216 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2450L ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$440 | $410 | |
2620 v2 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | ||
E5-2689 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | $410 | |
E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $410 | |
X5650 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $410 | |
E5620 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$456 | $410 | |
3930K vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$238 | $410 | |
E3-1230 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||