Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2620
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2620 based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5-2620 vs E5-2450L |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2620
- 2 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
5.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2620
 | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Much better performance per watt 6.57 pt/W |
| | Much better performance per dollar 1.52 pt/$ | | Higher turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz |
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2450L
- 1.8 GHz
- Octa core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2450L
| | Much more l3 cache 20 MB | | More threads 16 |
| | Lower typical power consumption 56.88W | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2620 vs E5-2450L among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2620CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 6.57 pt/W | vs | 3.29 pt/W | Around 2x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 1.52 pt/$ | vs | 0.21 pt/$ | More than 7.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 15 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 56.88W | vs | 77.19W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2620 vs E5-2450L
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2620 | vs | E5-2450L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 70W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 16.86 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 61.32 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.57 pt/W | 3.29 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 56.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 57,600 MB/s | 32,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2620 | vs | E5-2450L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 20 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Triple Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s | 38,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 393,216 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2620  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2450L Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $410 | ||
| E5-2689 vs E5-2620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $440 | $410 | |
| 2620 v2 vs E5-2620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $238 | $410 | |
| E3-1230 vs E5-2620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $520 | $410 | |
| X5650 vs E5-2620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $262 | $410 | |
| E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,443 | $410 | |
| X5670 vs E5-2620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $279 | $410 | |
| E5620 vs E5-2620 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
