CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2620 vs D-1528 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon D-1528 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon D-1528  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Xeon D-1528

Intel Xeon D-1528

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2620

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 1.52 pt/$ vs 0.65 pt/$ More than 2.2x better performance per dollar
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports more RAM 393,216 MB vs 131,072 MB Supports 3x more RAM
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.28 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Xeon D-1528

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon D-1528

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 77.19W 2.7x lower typical power consumption
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,385 vs 1,231 Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score
Slightly better performance per watt 7.25 pt/W vs 6.57 pt/W More than 10% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2620 vs D-1528

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2620  vs
D-1528 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.9 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Hexa core Hexa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 35W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 6.57 pt/W 7.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 28.44W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 1

details

Xeon E5-2620  vs
D-1528 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 12
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.28 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.28 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 42,666.64 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 393,216 MB 131,072 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Report a correction
Intel Xeon D-1528
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus