Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5-2620

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2620

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2620

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.65 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better PassMark score 7,957 vs 751 More than 10.5x better PassMark score
More threads 12 vs 2 10 more threads
More cores 6 vs 2 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,231 vs 441 More than 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better performance per watt 6.57 pt/W vs 2.23 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.28 GHz vs 1.65 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.65 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD G G-T56E

Reasons to consider the
AMD G G-T56E

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 77.19W 5.3x lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 77.4 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 5.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 5.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 50% more l2 cache per core
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Mar, 2012 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2620 vs G G-T56E

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2620  vs
G G-T56E 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Hexa core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon E5-2620  vs
G G-T56E 
Threads 12 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 77.4°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.28 GHz 1.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.28 GHz 1.65 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 18W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 6.57 pt/W 2.23 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 14.63W
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Report a correction
AMD G G-T56E
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus