Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2620

Report a correction
More l3 cache 15 MB vs 8 MB Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 12 vs 4 Three times as many threads
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Front view of AMD FX 4110

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4110

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 3x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2620  vs FX 4110 

L2 cache

FX 4110
4 MB

L3 cache

Xeon E5-2620
15 MB
FX 4110
8 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2620  vs
FX 4110 
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon E5-2620  vs
FX 4110 
Threads 12 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 15 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

TDP 95W 95W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 83.22 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 77.19W

bus

Architecture QPI HyperTransport 3.1
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Report a correction
AMD FX 4110
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus