Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2609 v3 |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 9,977 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,683 | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 12.6 pt/W |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 9,977 | vs | 5,934 | Around 70% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,683 | vs | 1,114 | More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 12.6 pt/W | vs | 1.83 pt/W | Around 7x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 4.08 pt/$ | vs | 0.5 pt/$ | Around 8.2x better performance per dollar | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 6 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.87 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E5-2609 v3 vs the E5-2620 v3. | |||||||
summary | Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | E5-2609 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 85W | 85W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 12.6 pt/W | 1.83 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 69.06W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | E5-2609 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 6 | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 15 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 70.9°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.87 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.66 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | ||
Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $262 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$612 | $262 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$440 | $262 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2620 v2 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,000 | $262 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $262 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$390 | $262 | |
Intel Core i7 5820K vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||