CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2667V4 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel E5-2667V4 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel E5-2667V4  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel E5-2667V4

Intel E5-2667V4

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 4.08 pt/$ vs 0.23 pt/$ More than 18x better performance per dollar
Much lower typical power consumption 69.06W vs 109.69W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 12.6 pt/W vs 3.45 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year vs 32.52 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year vs 118.26 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel E5-2667V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2667V4

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Significantly more l3 cache 25 MB vs 15 MB More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better PassMark score 16,389 vs 9,977 Around 65% better PassMark score
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 786,432 MB Supports 2x more RAM
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly more l3 cache per core 3.13 MB/core vs 2.5 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
More threads 16 vs 12 4 more threads
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,882 vs 1,683 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jul, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 78 °C vs 72.6 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 2.87 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2667V4

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2667V4
40,990.5

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2667V4
3,054.5

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2620 v3
2,750,000 MB/s
E5-2667V4
2,580 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-2667V4
16,389

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2620 v3  vs
E5-2667V4 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Hexa core Octa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 85W 135W
Annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year 32.52 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year 118.26 $/year
Performance per watt 12.6 pt/W 3.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 69.06W 109.69W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 64,000 MB/s 76,800 MB/s
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 9,600 MT/s
Clock speed 4,000 MHz 4,800 MHz

details

Xeon E5-2620 v3  vs
E5-2667V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 16
L3 cache 15 MB 25 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 3.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C Unknown - 78°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.66 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.87 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.66 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Report a correction
Intel E5-2667V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus