0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2620V4 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- 2.4 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 4.08 pt/$ | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 12.6 pt/W | ![]() | Slightly higher turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2620V4
- 2.1 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the E5-2620V4
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | More l3 cache 20 MB |
![]() | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB | ![]() | More cores 8 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 4.08 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | Around 8x better performance per dollar | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 12.6 pt/W | vs | 2.54 pt/W | Around 5x better performance per watt | |||
Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,683 | vs | 1,527 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.66 GHz | vs | 2.37 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.87 GHz | vs | 2.58 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 15 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 786,432 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 6 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Better PassMark score | 11,389 | vs | 9,977 | Around 15% better PassMark score | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2620V4
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2620 v3
14,662
E5-2620V4
8,618
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2620 v3
2,702
E5-2620V4
2,491
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2620 v3
2,750,000 MB/s
E5-2620V4
3,210 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2620 v3
9,977
E5-2620V4
11,389
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2620 v3
1,683
E5-2620V4
1,527
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | E5-2620V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 85W | 85W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 12.6 pt/W | 2.54 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 69.06W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | E5-2620V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.37 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.87 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.66 GHz | 2.37 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 ![]() | Intel E5-2620V4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$390 | $262 | |
5820K vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $262 | |
6700K vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | ||
E5-2689 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$440 | $262 | |
2620 v2 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | $262 | |
2650 v2 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | $262 | |
E5-2620 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $262 | |
E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||