Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs AMD FX 4110 |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2609
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2609
 | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | | Slightly more l3 cache 10 MB |
| | Lower typical power consumption 65W | | More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD FX 4110
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 4110
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly more l3 cache | 10 MB | vs | 8 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 77.19W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2609 vs FX 4110
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2609 | vs | FX 4110 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon E5-2609 | vs | FX 4110 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 10 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | HyperTransport 3.1 | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2609  Report a correction |  AMD FX 4110 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $410 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs E5-2620 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs E5 2609 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $305 | $279 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs E5620 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $305 | $240 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i7 3820 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $305 | $238 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs E3-1230 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $305 | $240 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i7 3770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $305 | $294 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 vs E5-1620 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
