Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 2609 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 2609 v2

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Lower typical power consumption 65W vs 84.5W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 5 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 91.1 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 25.05 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Itanium 9140N

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9140N

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 18 MB vs 10 MB 80% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 9 MB/core vs 2.5 MB/core More than 3.5x more l3 cache per core
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Features Key features of the Xeon E5 2609 v2  vs Itanium 9140N 

clock speed

Xeon E5 2609 v2
2.5 GHz
Itanium 9140N
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5 2609 v2  vs
Itanium 9140N 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Xeon E5 2609 v2  vs
Itanium 9140N 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 10 MB 18 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 9 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 2 4
Operating temperature Unknown - 71°C Unknown - 76°C

power consumption

TDP 80W 104W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 25.05 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 91.1 $/year
Typical power consumption 65W 84.5W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 1
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Xeon E5 2609 v2
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9140N
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus