Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3

Report a correction
More l3 cache 15 MB vs 8 MB Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 24x more RAM
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly lower typical power consumption 42.25W vs 62.56W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 88.84 °C vs 67.4 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 8 4 more threads
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 12.53 $/year vs 18.55 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 45.55 $/year vs 67.45 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz 70% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 2.07 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2608L v3  vs Core i7 3770 

clock speed

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon E5-2608L v3
2.07 GHz
Core i7 3770
4.03 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2608L v3  vs
Core i7 3770 
Clock speed 2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 52W 77W
Annual home energy cost 12.53 $/year 18.55 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 45.55 $/year 67.45 $/year
Typical power consumption 42.25W 62.56W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 2 1
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E5-2608L v3  vs
Core i7 3770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 8
L3 cache 15 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 88.84°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.07 GHz 4.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 4.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.07 GHz 4.03 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
DDR
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus