Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 vs E5-2450L v2 |
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
- 2.4 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
 | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz |
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 80 °C |
VS
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2450L v2
- 1.7 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the E5-2450L v2
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 48.75W | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 52.56 $/year |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.45 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | More than 50% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 80 °C | vs | 68 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 48.75W | vs | 77.19W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2470 v2 vs E5-2450L v2
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2470 v2 | vs | E5-2450L v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Deca core | Deca core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 60W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 14.45 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 52.56 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 48.75W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 32,000 MB/s | 28,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,600 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2470 v2 | vs | E5-2450L v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 20 | 20 | |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 25 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Voltage range | 0.65 - 1.3V | 0.65 - 1.3V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 80°C | Unknown - 68°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 38,400 MB/s | 38,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 393,216 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2450L v2 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,440 | $1,480 | |
| E5-2470 v2 vs E5-2470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,440 | $410 | |
| E5-2470 v2 vs E5-2620 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,440 | $1,107 | |
| E5-2470 v2 vs E5-2450 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,440 | $551 | |
| E5-2470 v2 vs E5-2430 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,440 | $878 | |
| E5-2470 v2 vs 2640 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,440 | $1,534 | |
| E5-2470 v2 vs 2670 v2 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $1,219 | $1,107 | |
| E5-2450L v2 vs E5-2450L | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
