0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 vs Core i3 3220 |
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
- 2.4 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2.5 MB | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 25 MB |
![]() | More cores 10 | ![]() | More threads 20 |
VS
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3220
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2.5 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 5x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 3 MB | More than 8.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 10 | vs | 2 | 8 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 20 | vs | 4 | 16 more threads | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | More than 65% more l3 cache per core | |||
Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 12x more RAM | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 80 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | Sep, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 77.19W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2470 v2 vs Core i3 3220
clock speed
Xeon E5-2470 v2
2.4 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E5-2470 v2
2.5 MB
Core i3 3220
0.5 MB
L3 cache
Xeon E5-2470 v2
25 MB
Core i3 3220
3 MB
TDP
Xeon E5-2470 v2
95W
Core i3 3220
55W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2470 v2 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Deca core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1356 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 38,400 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | Xeon E5-2470 v2 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 20 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 25 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 24 | 33 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 80°C | Unknown - 65.3°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 44.69W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 ![]() | Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $75 | |
3220 vs G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
3220 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $76 | |
3220 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
3220 vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||