Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2450L

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2450L

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 1 15 more threads
Significantly better PassMark score 7,389 vs 435 Around 17x better PassMark score
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Core Solo T1200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo T1200

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2450L vs Core Solo T1200

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2450L  vs
Core Solo T1200 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Octa core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon E5-2450L  vs
Core Solo T1200 
Threads 16 1
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 56.88W N/A

bus

Clock speed 4,000 MHz 667 MHz
Intel Xeon E5-2450L
Report a correction
Intel Core Solo T1200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus