Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2449L

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2449L

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 20 MB vs 3 MB Around 6.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 8 vs 2 6 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 4 12 more threads
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 65% more l3 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 3317U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3317U

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 40.63W 2.9x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 12.04 $/year 2.9x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 43.8 $/year 2.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2449L  vs Core i5 3317U 

clock speed

Xeon E5-2449L
1.4 GHz
Core i5 3317U
1.7 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2449L  vs
Core i5 3317U 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Octa core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon E5-2449L  vs
Core i5 3317U 
Threads 16 4
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

TDP 50W 17W
Annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 40.63W 13.81W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Data rate 32,000 MB/s 2,560 MB/s
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E5-2449L
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3317U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus