0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2430L vs Itanium 9030 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2430L
- 2 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2430L
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 15 MB |
![]() | More cores 6 | ![]() | More threads 12 |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Itanium 9030
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Itanium 9030
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core |
![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 8 MB | Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 2 | 10 more threads | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 48.75W | vs | 84.5W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | vs | 91.1 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | vs | 25.05 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 2 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | 12x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 60% more l3 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration |
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2430L vs Itanium 9030
clock speed
Xeon E5-2430L
2 GHz
Itanium 9030
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon E5-2430L
2 MB
Itanium 9030
8 MB
L3 cache
Xeon E5-2430L
15 MB
Itanium 9030
8 MB
TDP
Xeon E5-2430L
60W
Itanium 9030
104W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2430L | vs | Itanium 9030 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2430L | vs | Itanium 9030 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 4 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 4 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 4 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 1.09 - 1.25V | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 60W | 104W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | 25.05 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | 91.1 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 48.75W | 84.5W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No |
Intel Xeon E5-2430L ![]() | Intel Itanium 9030 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$573 | $662 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2430 vs E5-2430L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$832 | $662 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs E5-2430L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$612 | $662 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs E5-2430L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $662 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs E5-2430L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,107 | $662 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2450L vs E5-2430L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$551 | $662 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2430 v2 vs E5-2430L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,552 | ||
AMD E2 3200 vs Intel Itanium 9030 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||