Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2430
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2430 based on its value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5-2430 vs E5-2420 v2 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2430
- 2.2 GHz
- Hexa core
5.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2430
 | Much better performance per watt 7.36 pt/W | | Much better performance per dollar 1.22 pt/$ |
| | More l2 cache 2 MB | | More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core |
VS
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- 2.2 GHz
- Hexa core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2420 v2
| | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Lower typical power consumption 65W |
| | Newer Jan, 2014 | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2430 vs E5-2420 v2 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2430CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per watt | 7.36 pt/W | vs | 2.67 pt/W | More than 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per dollar | 1.22 pt/$ | vs | 0.53 pt/$ | More than 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| More l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1.5 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 77.19W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2430 vs E5-2420 v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2430 | vs | E5-2420 v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.36 pt/W | 2.67 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 65W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 28,800 MB/s | 28,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 3,600 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2430 | vs | E5-2420 v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 12 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 15 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 0.65 - 1.3V | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 19,200 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 393,216 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2430  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $406 | $414 | |
| E5-2420 v2 vs E5-2420 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $406 | $410 | |
| E5-2420 v2 vs E5-2620 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $406 | $440 | |
| E5-2420 v2 vs 2620 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $406 | $180 | |
| E5-2420 v2 vs 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $406 | $264 | |
| E5-2420 v2 vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $406 | $240 | |
| E5-2420 v2 vs 3770 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $573 | $551 | |
| E5-2430 vs E5-2430 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
