CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2430 vs 2431 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5-2430

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2430

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2430

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 15 MB vs 6 MB 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 6,878 vs 4,516 More than 50% better PassMark score
Much better performance per watt 7.36 pt/W vs 1.89 pt/W Around 4x better performance per watt
More threads 12 vs 6 Twice as many threads
Much more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2.5x more l3 cache per core
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer May, 2012 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of AMD Opteron 2431

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2431

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 77.19W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 50% more l2 cache per core
Lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2430 vs Opteron 2431

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2430  vs
Opteron 2431 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Hexa core Hexa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 75W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 7.36 pt/W 1.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 60.94W

details

Xeon E5-2430  vs
Opteron 2431 
Threads 12 6
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 15 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Voltage range 0.6 - 1.35V 1 - UnknownV

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture QPI HyperTransport 3.0
Clock speed 3,600 MHz 2,200 MHz
Intel Xeon E5-2430
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2431
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus