0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3 vs AMD A8 6410 |
Released January, 2015
Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3
- 1.8 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | More threads 16 |
![]() | More cores 8 | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released July, 2014
AMD A8 6410
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD A8 6410
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more threads | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Newer | Jan, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date 5 months later | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 44.69W | 3.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 3.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 3.7x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2428L v3 vs A8 6410
clock speed
Xeon E5-2428L v3
1.8 GHz
A8 6410
2 GHz
TDP
Xeon E5-2428L v3
55W
A8 6410
15W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2428L v3 | vs | A8 6410 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3L-1866 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 |
details | Xeon E5-2428L v3 | vs | A8 6410 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon R5 series | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 800 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 12.19W |
Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3 ![]() | AMD A8 6410 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4010U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
5200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
4005U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
5010U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4210U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4030U vs 6410 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||