Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3 vs AMD A8 6410 |
Released January, 2015
Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3
- 1.8 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3
 | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | More threads 16 |
| | More cores 8 | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released July, 2014
AMD A8 6410
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD A8 6410
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W |
| | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more threads | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date 5 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 44.69W | 3.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 3.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 3.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2428L v3 vs A8 6410
clock speed
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2428L v3 | vs | A8 6410 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3L-1866 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
details | Xeon E5-2428L v3 | vs | A8 6410 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 16 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon R5 series | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 800 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 12.19W | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2428L v3  Report a correction |  AMD A8 6410 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 4010U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 5200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 5010U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | ||
| 4005U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 4210U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 4030U vs 6410 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
