Winner
Intel Core i7 3770
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770 based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i7 3770 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2420
- 1.9 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
5.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2420
 | Is unlocked Yes | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | More l3 cache 15 MB | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i7 3770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
8.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i7 3770
| | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2420 vs 3770 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 8 MB | Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 12x more RAM | |||
| More threads | 12 | vs | 8 | 4 more threads | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 80% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 65% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 2.33 pt/$ | vs | 1.26 pt/$ | More than 85% better performance per dollar | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.03 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,072 | vs | 1,355 | Around 55% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 62.56W | vs | 77.19W | Around 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | vs | 5.47 pt/W | More than 30% better performance per watt | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.32 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 18.55 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 67.45 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i7 3770
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Core i7 3770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 77W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 18.55 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 67.45 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.47 pt/W | 7.25 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 62.56W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Core i7 3770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 8 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 4.03 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz | 4.32 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 4.03 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.x | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | 5,339.9 | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2420  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 3770 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $240 | $280 | |
| 3770 vs 4770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $264 | |
| 3770 vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $180 | |
| 3770 vs 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $305 | |
| 3770 vs 2600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $168 | |
| 3770 vs 3570 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $190 | |
| 3770 vs 4460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $305 | |
| 3770 vs 4790 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
