0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i3 530 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2420
- 1.9 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2420
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Significantly more l3 cache 15 MB | ![]() | More cores 6 |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i3 530
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 530
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2420CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 4 MB | 3.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 8,570 | vs | 2,584 | More than 3.2x better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 4 | Three times as many threads | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 92.5W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 5.47 pt/W | vs | 1.21 pt/W | More than 4.5x better performance per watt | |||
Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 16,773.12 MB | Supports around 23.5x more RAM | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,355 | vs | 1,112 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Better performance per dollar | 1.26 pt/$ | vs | 1.14 pt/$ | More than 10% better performance per dollar | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 35.3 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 88.48 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.31 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.9 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 50% more l2 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i3 530
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2420
10,344
Core i3 530
3,904
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2420
1,754
Core i3 530
1,800
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2420
985,150 MB/s
Core i3 530
123,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2420
9,662
Core i3 530
3,755
GeekBench
Xeon E5-2420
9,662
Core i3 530
5,758
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2420
8,570
Core i3 530
2,584
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2420
1,355
Core i3 530
1,112
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Core i3 530 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 73W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 35.3 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 88.48 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.47 pt/W | 1.21 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 92.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s |
details | Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Core i3 530 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 4 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 0.65 - 1.4V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 13 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 4.31 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 4.31 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 733 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 16,773.12 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 ![]() | Intel Core i3 530 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $117 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i3 530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $117 | |
Intel Core i3 2100 vs 530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$144 | $117 | |
Intel Core i5 650 vs i3 530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $117 | |
Intel Core i5 760 vs i3 530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | $117 | |
Intel Core i5 750 vs i3 530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $117 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs 530 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||