0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs AMD Opteron 8356 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2420
- 1.9 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2420
![]() | Much more l3 cache 15 MB | ![]() | Is unlocked Yes |
![]() | More cores 6 | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 5.47 pt/W |
VS
Released April, 2008
AMD Opteron 8356
- 2.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 8356
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 60.94W | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 2 MB | 7.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better performance per watt | 5.47 pt/W | vs | 2.16 pt/W | More than 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 4 | Three times as many threads | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 5x more l3 cache per core | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 77.19W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.3 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2420 vs Opteron 8356
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2420
10,344
Opteron 8356
13,936
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2420
1,754
Opteron 8356
977.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2420
985,150 MB/s
Opteron 8356
79.5 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Opteron 8356 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 75W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 18.07 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 65.7 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.47 pt/W | 2.16 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 60.94W |
details | Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Opteron 8356 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 1 - UnknownV | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 2.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 2.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 ![]() | AMD Opteron 8356 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $406 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $240 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i7 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $410 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $205 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i5 2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $180 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $125 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$414 | $264 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2420 vs E5-2407 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||