0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2407 vs E3-1220 v2 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2407
- 2.2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2407
![]() | Supports more RAM 393,216 MB | ![]() | More l3 cache 10 MB |
![]() | More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E3-1220 v2
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 6,602 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,806 | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.45 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 33,556.48 MB | Supports around 11.8x more RAM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More l3 cache | 10 MB | vs | 8 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 6,602 | vs | 3,795 | Around 75% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,806 | vs | 1,139 | Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.45 GHz | vs | 2.35 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 56.06W | vs | 65W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 60.44 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 16.62 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2407 vs E3-1220 v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2407
6,112
Xeon E3-1220 v2
9,259
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2407
1,652
Xeon E3-1220 v2
2,768
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2407
1,385,000 MB/s
Xeon E3-1220 v2
2,200,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2407
5,868
Xeon E3-1220 v2
9,082
GeekBench
Xeon E5-2407
5,868
Xeon E3-1220 v2
9,082
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2407
3,795
Xeon E3-1220 v2
6,602
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2407
1,139
Xeon E3-1220 v2
1,806
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2407 | vs | E3-1220 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 69W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 16.62 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 60.44 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.31 pt/W | 13.51 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 56.06W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,599.99 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 33,556.48 MB |
details | Xeon E5-2407 | vs | E3-1220 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 10 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 1 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 2.35 GHz | 3.45 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.35 GHz | 3.45 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
Intel Xeon E5-2407 ![]() | Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$210 | $200 | |
E3-1220 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $200 | |
3470 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $200 | |
E3-1230 v2 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$168 | $200 | |
3570 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$171 | $200 | |
C2750 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $200 | |
3770K vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
3220 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||