Intel Xeon E5-2403 v2 vs E5-2403 |
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2403 v2
- 1.8 GHz
- Quad core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2403 v2
 | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Newer Jan, 2014 |
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2403
- 1.8 GHz
- Quad core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2403
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Much better performance per watt 5.67 pt/W |
| | Much better performance per dollar 2.22 pt/$ |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2403 v2 vs E5-2403 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 5.67 pt/W | vs | 1.01 pt/W | More than 5.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 2.22 pt/$ | vs | 0.42 pt/$ | More than 5.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2403 v2 vs E5-2403
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2403 v2 | vs | E5-2403 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.01 pt/W | 5.67 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 65W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,200 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2403 v2 | vs | E5-2403 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 10 MB | 10 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Voltage range | 0.65 - 1.3V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 19,200 MB/s | 25,599.99 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 393,216 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2403 v2  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2403 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $238 | $204 | |
| E3-1230 vs E5-2403 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $204 | |
| E3-1220 v2 vs E5-2403 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $204 | |
| E3-1230 v2 vs E5-2403 | ||
 | VS | |
| $264 | $204 | |
| E5-2407 vs E5-2403 | ||
 | VS | |
| $414 | $204 | |
| E5-2420 vs E5-2403 | ||
 | VS | |
| $279 | $204 | |
| E5620 vs E5-2403 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $279 | $192 | |
| E5620 vs E5-2403 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
